×

To enhance security, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) is mandatory for all HL7 users. More information

 

FHIR Risk Adjustment (PSS in Confluence)

Basics

FHIR Risk Adjustment (PSS in Confluence)

1705
Ballot - STU to Normative


FHIR Implementation Guide; FHIR Profile

Implementation Guide

Details

The risk adjustment use case acknowledges the importance of risk-adjusted premium calculations to government managed care and seeks to

- better inform clinicians of opportunities to address risk adjusted conditions,

- better enable payers to communicate risk adjustment information, and

- enhance government sponsors’ ability to allocate funding accurately.

To accomplish this:

- Payers need a standard protocol to share and receive clinical data related to risk adjustment with responsible providers.

- Providers need a standard protocol to share and receive clinical data related to risk adjustment with responsible payers.

- Payers and providers need a standard methodology to communicate risk based coding, documentation and submission status of chronic illnesses.

The resulting bi-directional, real-time, FHIR-based communication will connect payer intelligence with EHR data at the point of care, facilitating providers documentation of relevant chronic illnesses. This model ensures accurate and complete patient assessment to support Value-Based Care programs.

This project may utilize specific triggers and exchange methods (CDS Hooks, Pull, etc.), use of other interoperability 'standards' (e.g. SMART on FHIR, CQL) and specific use of FHIR resources to effectively verify and facilitate documentation supporting chronic illness needed for risk adjustment, medical necessity and care coordination.

This project will define a standard methodology for payers to communicate risk based coding gaps to providers. This project will also define a approach to trigger the evaluation and/or collection of documentation for specific chronic conditions that are sufficient in scope to satisfy both clinical and administrative needs. The project team will select an initial set of chronic conditions (e.g. CHF, COPD, Diabetes) to use as demonstrations/examples of the underlying framework.

This project will reference, where possible the 'standards' defined by the Health Record exchange (HRex) Library/Framework Implementation Guide which in turn will utilize prior work from Argonaut, US Core and QI Core effort for FHIR R4 where appropriate. If this FHIR implementation guide is unable to use a US Core profile, we will follow the Cross Group Projects WG's variance request process, and provide the US Realm Steering Committee an approved rationale for deviation in the implementation guide where applicable.

The ultimate goal is to support the accurate documentation of chronic illnesses to support communication of risk based coding gaps and to facilitate risk adjustment and care management.

The project team plans to work with existing FHIR artifacts where possible. If changes are necessary, the project team will work with the responsible Work Group to review and implement (via tracker items or new PSS) any necessary enhancements to base FHIR resources, extensions, and/or profiles.


Providers need to accurately document chronic illness in their patient for clinical care, care coordination, risk adjustment, and to show medical necessity. Payers need this information for accurate risk adjustment, to document medical necessity for covered procedures and devices, and to facilitate care coordination and potential portability of coverage decisions.

This PSS builds on existing or in process implementation guides for the automation of requests to a payer for coverage information (Coverage Requirements Discovery – CRD), definition of documentation and payer rules (Documentation Templates and Payer Rules) access to provider information (Clinical Data Exchange – CDex), the Health Record Exchange Library/Framework (HRex), and reporting gaps in care in the Data Exchange for Quality Measures (DEQM).

Currently, no FHIR implementation guide exists to standardize the format of communicating risk based coding gap between payers and the method of chronic illness documentation evaluation and management. This implementation guide will provide a standard for adoption by both providers and payers to communicate risk based coding gaps and for the evaluation and documentation of chronic illness.



Standard For Trial Use (First Ballot Cycle) - Target: 2022 Jan Ballot Complete STU Reconciliation - Target: 2022 May Request STU Publication - Target: 2022 May WGM Submit for STU 2 Ballot (Second Ballot Cycle) - Target: 2022 Sep Ballot Complete STU 2 Reconciliation - Target: 2023 Jan Request STU 2 Publication - Target: 2023 Jan WGM STU 2 Period - Target: 2023 Jan -2024 Jan Additional STU cycles as needed as needed Submit for Normative Ballot - Target: 2024 Jan Ballot Complete Normative Reconciliation - Target: 2024 May WGM Submit Publication Request - Target: 2024 Sep WGM Receive ANSI Approval - Target: 2025 Jan Project End Date (all objectives have been met) - Target: 2025 Jan


PSS: https://confluence.hl7.org/display/CQIWC/FHIR+Risk+Adjustment+PSS https://github.com/HL7/davinci-ra

Was the content externally developed ? Y Da Vinci

FHIR R4, US-Core

Clinical and Public Health Laboratories, Immunization Registries, Quality Reporting Agencies, Regulatory Agency, Payors, Other (specify in Misc. Notes below),Clinical and Public Health Laboratories; Emergency Services; Local and State Departments of Health; Medical Imaging Service; Healthcare Institutions (hospitals, long term care, home care, mental health); Other (specify in Misc. Notes below),Pharmaceutical; EHR, PHR; Equipment; Health Care IT; Clinical Decision Support Systems; Lab

1) Providence 2) BCBS Alabama 3) United Healthcare 4) EPIC 5) Cigna

CMS NPRM, Risk adjustment requirements for payers

Da Vinci, Risk Adjustment, Risk Based Coding Gaps


Yes

N/A

No

2025 June: TSC approved an unballoted STU publication request for Da Vinci Risk Adjustment Implementation Guide STU 2.1 2025 January: TSC approved STU Publication Request for HL7 FHIR Implementation Guide: Risk Adjustment, Release 1 - US Realm for 2 years 2024 August: TSC approved STU Extension Request for HL7 FHIR Implementation Guide: Risk Adjustment, Release 1 - US Realm for 2 years. 2022 June: TSC approved STU Publication Request HL7 FHIR Implementation Guide: Risk Adjustment, Release 1 - US Realm Other: Federal Healthcare Agencies (e.g. CMS), Providers (e.g. Physicians)
Organization & Realm

Realm Specific - Enter "U.S." or name of HL7 Affiliate below

U.S.
People

Yan Heras, Linda Michaelsen, Viet Nguyen



Clinical Quality Information Work Group


Status & Dates

Active

STU - Reconcile

03/12/2021

05/01/2027

2027 May WGM/Ballot

05/01/2027

2027 May WGM/Ballot

2026 May Ballot Cycle Info: STU Ballot Results: Met basic vote requirements. 13 negatives to reconcile. Document Name; HL7 FHIR Implementation Guide: Risk Adjustment, Release 1 - US Realm 2022 Jan Ballot Cycle Info: STU Ballot Results: Did not meet basic vote requirements. 23 Negatives to reconcile Document Name: HL7 FHIR Implementation Guide: Risk Adjustment, Release 1 - US Realm (See Jira Ballot Dashboard)
Approvals

06/07/2021


Received


Received




System Info






06/25/2026

Anne Wizauer