×

To enhance security, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) is mandatory for all HL7 users. More information

 

Profile and Implementation Guide for Advancing Collection of Standardized Symptoms Data (Jira PSS-2566)

Basics

Profile and Implementation Guide for Advancing Collection of Standardized Symptoms Data (Jira PSS-2566)

1929
Ballot - STU to Normative


FHIR Implementation Guide; FHIR Profile

Create New Standard

Details

The anticipated deliverable will be the HL7 FHIR Symptoms Profile and Implementation Guide (IG). The Symptoms IG will support a structured approach to exchanging patient symptoms related data and identify example use cases standardized symptoms data are useful. The project team will continue exploring potential opportunities for integrating symptoms data standards into HL7 Accelerators, for example, the CodeX community for more specific use cases. This FHIR IG will use the Universal Realm based on our sponsoring work group's recommendation.

Our goal is to have the profile and IG developed and ready for Connectathon testing in September 2025 and first ballot cycle in January 2026.

By way of background, the National Quality Forum, The Joint Commission, and the American Medical Association have partnered to lead the translation of symptoms concepts into requirements for exchanging symptoms data using FHIR. With engagement from physicians, clinicians, patient advocates, and other stakeholders, the project team has drafted a conceptual model for capturing symptoms information obtained from patients and recorded by clinicians. This can be thought of as creating a well represented symptom. In other words, defining specific attributes of a symptom as a tool for software developers and EHR vendors to use as a guide. Symptoms are defined as something that a person feels or experiences that may indicate that they have a disease or condition. Symptoms can only be reported by the person experiencing them. They cannot be observed by a health care provider or other person and do.[1]

The project is unique in that it has incorporated physician feedback early into the standards development process. This conceptual model has already been informed and enhanced by two technical expert panels including physicians, healthcare IT experts and standards subject matter experts, a literature review, and preliminary presentations to four HL7 workgroups (CIMI, OO, PC, and CIC) at the September 2024 Working Group Meeting. The expert panel crafted the conceptual model detailing the key features of a symptom such as the patient input, timing, location, severity, triggers, and other key features (see attached image).

We solicited feedback on which elements in the conceptual model should always be required, while others are suggested, based on feedback from clinicians regarding their workflow and what elements would be most important and least burdensome for their health systems to exchange. This information will help guide us in developing a formal HL7 Symptoms FHIR Profile and IG.

[1] National Cancer Institute. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/symptom. www.cancer.gov. Published February 2, 2011. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/symptom


The purpose and rationale for this project center around the absence of standardized definitions and formats for symptoms data that hinders effective sharing across providers, leading to data silos and interruptions in critical diagnostic thinking. Diagnostic errors in the United States, where 795,000 individuals annually experience death or permanent disability due to diagnostic error.[1],[2] This initiative aims to decrease missed, delayed, or inaccurate diagnoses by enhancing the documentation and exchange of symptoms, a crucial step in the diagnostic process. For example, Liberman and Newman-Toker's SPADE framework highlights how a lack of structured symptom-disease pairs in electronic health records has contributed to misdiagnosis, such as benign dizziness being incorrectly documented instead of early stroke, which resulted in delayed treatment and increased patient harm.[3] To overcome these barriers, the project will develop an HL7 Symptoms FHIR Profile and Implementation Guide (IG) that structures symptom data for seamless exchange across visits and health systems. This effort will enhance recognition of symptom patterns, reducing clinician burden by streamlining the diagnostic process, and ultimately support informed diagnostic decision-making, improving outcomes for patients. The project’s collaborative approach, which integrates input from medical professionals, healthcare IT experts, and standards subject matter experts, enhances its potential in advancing patient care.

There are many potential use cases for utilizing standardized symptoms data, for instance:

Allow for reaching an accurate diagnosis earlier in the patient journey

Allow for clustering of symptoms data using visualization at the point of care

Clinical decision support at the point of care

Provide enough granular data for advanced technologies like artificial intelligence and natural language processing to derive an accurate diagnosis early in the patient journey

Integration of patient symptoms from a personal health record to an electronic health record

Utilization in clinical research

Syndromic surveillance in public health

CodeX Data DIRECT – Real World Data: access real-world data for streamlined analysis and insights from diverse healthcare sources that reflect actual patient experiences

CodeX Prior authorization in oncology: augment prior authorization to include symptoms data for consideration in utilization management, i.e. know the symptom(s) before approving treatment plan

CardX mCARD - Minimum Core Cardiovascular Data: a set of common data elements for cardiovascular care that is standardized, computable, clinically applicable in every EHR for patients with a cardiovascular diagnosis

Quality improvement initiatives

Documents Templates and Rules (DTR) for prior authorization workflow use case to include more granular clinical criteria

Rather than create separate projects and IGs for each use case, the proposed project will act as an umbrella for profiling and writing an IG for symptoms data standardization that can be re-used for multiple use cases.

[1] Singh H, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(9):727-731. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002627

[2] Newman-Toker DE, Nassery N, Schaffer AC, et al. Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;33(2):109-120. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014130

[3] Liberman AL, Newman-Toker DE. Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE): a conceptual framework and methodological approach for unearthing misdiagnosis-related harms using big data. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(7):557-566. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007032



FHIR IG R1 - STU Target May 2026


https://confluence.hl7.org/spaces/CIC/pages/324960988/Symptoms+Standardization+Project PSS: https://jira.hl7.org/browse/PSS-2566

National Quality Forum The Joint Commission Nictiz Zib-Centrum (HCIM-center) Cedars-Sinai Medical Center – Carl Berdahl, MD, MS, FACEP The American Medical Association, The American College of Emergency Physicians, Lehigh Valley Health Network - Jefferson Health, and Harrisburg University of Science and Technology – Steven Hardy, MD, MS American College of Physicians - Sharath Kharidi, MD, FACP, FAMIA UNC Health Alliance – Isha Mehta, MD, MPH, MMCi Elimu Informatics – David Lobach, MD, PhD, MS

External subject matter experts

Regulatory Agency, Payors

Nictiz Zib-Centrum (HCIM-center)

Clinical Decision Support Patient Satisfaction Patient Safety Expert Systems Electronic Health Records Claims and Payment Quality Assessment and Improvement Clinical Research Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning

Symptoms Data Standardization/Symptoms


Yes

N/A

Yes

2026 April: TSC approved an STU Publication request for HL7 FHIR Implementation Guide: Symptoms Data Standards, Edition 1 for 2 years Stakeholders: Academis/Research, Healthcare IT Vendors, Healthcare provider/user, Patients, Payer/Third Party Administrator, Providers, Regulatory Agency Other Stakeholders: Modeling facilitator: Nathan Davis
Organization & Realm

Universal

People

Lisa Anderson



Clinical Interoperability Council Work Group

Clinical Information Modeling Initiative Work Group; Patient Care Work Group; Patient Empowerment Work Group; Public Health Work Group

Status & Dates

Active

Active Project (Resources assigned to pjt)

02/27/2025

05/15/2028

2028 May WGM/Ballot

04/01/2028

2028 May WGM/Ballot

2026 Jan Ballot Cycle Info: STU Ballot Results: Met basic vote requirements. 15 Negatives to reconcile. Document Name: HL7 FHIR® Implementation Guide: Symptoms Data Standards, Edition 1
Approvals

04/07/2025


Not Needed


All Received




FHIR Management Group -- Agreed -- (PSS-2584)
System Info

253274

PSS-2566



04/09/2026

Anne Wizauer